Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Weber v. Louisville Metro Police Department
as 3:2014cv00315
Plaintiff:
Gary Dewayne Weber
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Jackson Lewis LLP et al
as 3:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C. Taylor
Defendant:
Jackson Lewis LLP and Katharine C. Weber, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cutter v. Weber et al
as 5:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Larry Cutter
Defendant:
David Weber , OMG Express Corp. and Ohio Casualty
Cross_claimant:
Ohio Casualty
Cross_defendant:
OMG Express Corp. and David Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. Weber et al
as 2:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Thomas L. Weber , Carrie L. Reed , Unknown Spouse of Thomas L. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Zain v. McCormick et al
as 4:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Revel Zain
Defendant:
Hugh McCormick, Ron Herrington, Rollings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cumberland and Ohio Co. of Texas, Inc. et al v. Goff
as 1:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
Cumberland and Ohio Co. of Texas, Inc. , Russ E. Belsaas , Timothy R. Dienhart and others
Defendant:
Clinton C. Goff
Allen v. Law Office of Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan et al
as 3:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ernest S. Allen
Defendant:
Law Office of Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan, Weber Rose PSC, United States Bankruptcy Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Weber v. Caudill
as 7:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Angel Wicker Weber
Defendant:
Nathan Caudill and Nathan Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
