Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Welch et al
as 6:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Karla R. Welch, Karla R. Welch, LLC and Kwik Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
United States of America v. Welch et al
as 1:2011cv02292
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
James (I) D. Welch, Amra Welch, James D. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Crockett et al
as 2:2010cv04247
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Davy O Crockett, Connie J Clark, Wedgewood Antiques, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
USA v. Stanley Zurn, et al
as 09-56890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STANLEY ZURN and KELLUNION, LLC
Defendant:
VALERY ZURN, AKA Valerie Zurn, ERNIE WELCH, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and others
USA v. Stanley Zurn, et al
as 09-55805
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STANLEY ZURN and KELLUNION, LLC
Defendant:
VALERY ZURN, AKA Valerie Zurn, ERNIE WELCH, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and others
USA v. Stanley Zurn, et al
as 09-55807
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STANLEY ZURN and KELLUNION, LLC
Defendant:
VALERY ZURN, AKA Valerie Zurn, ERNIE WELCH, THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and others
USA v. Welch
as 1:2008cv02757
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Carl Welch
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Laurel Hill Escrow Services, Inc. v. IDevelopment Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00301
Plaintiff:
Laurel Hill Escrow Services, Inc.
Defendant:
IDevelopment Inc, Advantage Towing Company Inc, Hose Pros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
United States Of America v. Stanley Zurn et al
as 2:2007cv07766
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Stanley Zurn, Valery Zurn, Kellunion and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
