Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Welch v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00192
Petitioner:
Brian Christopher Welch
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Welch v. USA
as 4:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Brian Christopher Welch
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Sydney Zuiker, Nate Spinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Welch et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Richard Warner Welch and Robbin L. Welch
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Wright v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Justin Wright
Defendant:
Jennifer Cozby, Shanel Patterson, Michael McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Amazing Realty, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sherman
Defendant:
Amazing Realty, L.L.C., Jennifer T Welch and Jennifer T. Welch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wright v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Justin Wright
Defendant:
Jennifer Cozby, Michael McGuire, Bryan McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination under A.D.A.
Wright v. McGuire et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Justin Wright
Defendant:
FNU McGuire, FNU Macdonald and FNU Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
