Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00748
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Teaf v. Lee et al
as 1:2020cv00190
Plaintiff:
Mr. Adrian Randall Teaf and Adrian Randall Teaf
Defendant:
Erin R. Lee, Wells Fargo Bank, The Estate of Louise S. Teaf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Rivas et al v. BSBSC as Substitute Trustee for U. S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Bear Sterns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2005-AC3 et al
as 8:2018cv01518
Plaintiff:
Saturnino Rivas and Nely Marilu Rivas-Avila
Defendant:
BSBSC as Substitute Trustee for U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Bear Sterns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2005-AC3, Residential Home Funding Corp., Wells Fargo Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. Brown et al
as 1:2018cv00868
Plaintiff:
Gamel Spencer
Defendant:
Kristine D. Brown and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02569
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02571
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dorman Long Technology Equipment, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02007
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Defendant:
Dorman Long Technology Equipment, LLC and Eroom Chem and Tech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 1:2017cv02008
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA , Dorman Long Technology Equipment, LLC and Eroom Chem and Tech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
