Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. TMTE Inc et al
as 3:2020cv02910
Defendant:
TMTE Inc, Lucas Thomas Erb, Lucas Asher and others
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation, State of Texas, State of Florida and others
Receiver:
Kelly Crawford
Respondent:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Bank of America NA
Petitioner:
Google, Portfolio Insider LLC and Carlos Cruz
Claimant:
Stephen Austin
Not Classified By Court:
Daniel Bruce Spitzer
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Defendant:
United States of America , Kirstjen M. Nielsen , Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Plaintiff:
State of Texas , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Karla Perez , Maria Rocha , Jose Magana-Salgado and others
Movant:
State of New Jersey
Amicu:
U.S. Rep. Steve King, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Texas et al v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
State of North Dakota, State of Nebraska, State of Ohio and others
Defendant:
United States Of America, Jennifer Granholm, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy, Scott De La Vega, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 4:2019cv03791
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, HealthNow New York, Inc., Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis and Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
State of Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
as 7:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, State of Kentucky, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Education, United States Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae:
Governor C. L. "Butch" Otter, State of Washington, Letitia James, Public Advocate for the City of New York and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Rachel Jona Tudor, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Charlsa Suzanne Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Richmond SA Services, Inc v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 4:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
Richmond SA Services, Inc
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
American Surgical Assistants, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 4:2016cv01146
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants, Inc , Fortbend SA Services, Inc. , National SA Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as 4:2015cv03491
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
