Cases 21 - 30 of 96
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02152
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, MARTIAL R. KNIESER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northrup v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2021cv00458
Defendant:
Risner, Dorothy Livers, Kenneth Watts and others
Plaintiff:
Kyler Northrup
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANUM v. BYRD et al
as 2:2021cv00216
Defendant:
KRISTEN DAUSS, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BRANUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2021cv00804
Defendant:
ROJOLIC, ROBERT CARTER, SCHILLING and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Defendant:
MATLOCK, T. TURNER, M. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAMARRON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00098
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE ZAMARRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael J Love and Michael Love
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, Tiffiny Turner, Buckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATES v. HANDLEY et al
as 2:2021cv00073
Defendant:
AMY HANDLEY and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES
Plaintiff:
BRANDON BATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant:
HANNAH WINNINGHAM, ELLIOT, TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RUIZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
