Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tepe v. United States
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
United States, Curtis L Collier, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tepe v. Nelson et al
as 1:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Lucille Lattimore Nelson and Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Petitioner:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hall v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Lori Hall
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Whirpool Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02374
Defendant:
Bitron Inc. China Co., Ltd., Whirpool Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation et al (TV2)
as 1:2020cv00332
Defendant:
Mark Jones, Whirlpool Corporation and Dakia Taylor
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reichert v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Gregory Reichert
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
