Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jamar Chambers v. Jeffrey Catoe, et al
as 19-40921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR CONRAD CHAMBERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WANDA OLIVER, WAYNE WHITTEN, HOLLIS L. WEBSTER, JR. and others
USA v. Candace Whitten
as 16-11395
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CANDACE WHITTEN
Eddie Whitten v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-41003
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE RAY WHITTEN
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
David Atwood, II v. Daniel Thomas, et al
as 16-60271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL THOMAS, Officer, CHRIS TANKERSLEY, Officer, PENNY JONES, Officer and others
La Tidtus Jones v. James Moore, et al
as 14-60740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MOORE, Warden, LIEUTENANT STANDLEY DOUGLAS, OCTAVIOUS HARRIS and others
La Tidtus Jones v. Marily Kelly, et al
as 14-60633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILY L. KELLY, Clerk, BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE, LORETTA JONES, Deputy Clerk and others
La Tidtus Jones v. James Moore, Warden, et al
as 14-60419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MOORE, Warden, LIEUTENANT STANDLEY DOUGLAS, OCTAVIOUS HARRIS and others
Cedric Nickerson v. TDCJ Inst Div, et al
as 13-40287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, GUILLERMO DELAROSA, STEPHEN FARQUHAR and others
USA v. David Whitten
as 11-31017
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL WHITTEN
Robert McIntosh v. Raymond Thompson, et al
as 11-40254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MCINTOSH
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND THOMPSON, Warden, D WHITTEN, Property Officer, DAN GANNON, Law Library Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
