Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Garrett v. Wicomico County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Garrett
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. Maryland District Court
as 21-7105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT #2-3 D.C. and WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Pullin v. Wicomico County Detention Center
as 8:2020cv03432
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Billy Pullin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gootee v. Wicomico County Detention Center
as 1:2020cv01217
Plaintiff:
K'Lin C Gootee
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Wicomico County Detention Center et al
as 8:2018cv02568
Defendant:
Deputy Tyler, Wicomico County Detention Center, Warden Ruth Colburne and others
Plaintiff:
Irving Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carter v. Wicomico County Detention Center
as 1:2018cv02169
Plaintiff:
Bryant Malcolm Carter
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Shivers v. Wicomico County Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Dwight Lamont Shivers, Jr.
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center and Aramark Food Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffman v. Byrd et al
as 8:2016cv03490
Plaintiff:
Joshua Huffman
Defendant:
Byrd, Schevel, Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Kaloroumakis et al
as 1:2016cv03127
Plaintiff:
John L. Richardson
Defendant:
George Kaloroumakis, Wicomico County Detention Center, Kevin Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Maryland District Court #2-3 D
as 16-6875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT #2-3 D.C. and WICOMICO COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
