Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Edward Brown v. Wilkinson County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 18-60439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILKINSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, REGINALD LEE JACKSON, Individually, and in his official capacity as Wilkinson County Sheriff, ED ALEXANDER, Individually, and in his official capacity as a deputy of Wilkinson County Sheriff Department and others
Prater v. Wilkinson County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Easter Prater
Defendant:
Wilkinson County, Mississippi , Wilkinson County, Mississippi Board of Supervisors , Will Seal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Unified Recovery Group, LLC. v. Wilkinson County, Mississippi
as 5:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Unified Recovery Group, LLC.
Defendant:
Wilkinson County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuesno v. Jackson et al
as 5:2008cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ronnie J. Tuesno
Defendant:
Reginald Jackson, Wilkinson County Sheriff Department and County Jail, Jesse Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morgan et al v. The Wilkinson County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert Morgan, James Jolliff, Jr. and Eugene Tolliver, Jr.
Defendant:
Wilkinson County, Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee, Wilkinson County, Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners, Jim Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith v. Packnett et al
as 5:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Donna Smith
Defendant:
O. J. Packnett, Reginald Jackson and Wilkinson County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Wilkinson County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2007cv00061
Plaintiff:
Eric Brown and Virginia W. Brown
Defendant:
Wilkinson County, Mississippi, Wilkinson County, Mississippi, Christopher James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
