Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nicole Carrillo v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Justin H Carrillo v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Justin H Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00017
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Abbott, Leslie Adams, Ricky Adamson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo et al v. Well Path et al
as 9:2020cv02790
Defendant:
Doctor or Nurse, Sheriff Al Cannon, Well Path and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Cottman and Joseph A Carrillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 5:2012cv00788
Petitioner:
Carlos Carrillo
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carrillo v. Warden Edgefield Satellite Prison Camp
as 0:2009cv02103
Petitioner:
Gabriel Carrillo
Respondent:
Warden Edgefield Satellite Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barfield et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Susie A Barfield, Tommy G Barton, Sr, Charles R Beard and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Jimmy Thornton and Mike Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Carrillo v. USA et al
as 8:2007cv03801
Petitioner:
Pedro Carrillo
Respondent:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
