Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Caudle v. DeKalb County Illinois et al
as 3:2018cv50019
Plaintiff:
Stacy Caudle
Defendant:
DeKalb County Illinois, State Of Illinois, John Christenson Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Montgomery County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Ross
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Jim Vozzi and Kevin Knisley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovett v. Neff et al
as 3:2017cv01023
Plaintiff:
Harding Lovett
Defendant:
Jarrett K. Neff, Beth Nester, State Attorney Office of St. Clair County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schollmeyer v. Lind et al
as 3:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Schollmeyer
Defendant:
Officer Lind, John Doe, 1, Madison County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speer v. Adams County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2017cv03069
Plaintiff:
David L Speer
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff's Department, Adams County Jail, Brent Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
Amanda Anderson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schaefer v. Winnebago County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv50377
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Schaefer
Defendant:
Winnebago County Sheriff's Department, Robert Redmond, Tim Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lane v. Putnam County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv01435
Plaintiff:
Joyce Lane
Defendant:
Putnam County Sheriff's Department , William Mucci and David Leigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
