Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Cross v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Gary Cross
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Matos v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Felix Matos, Jr.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Su v. BCBSM, Inc.
as 0:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
BCBSM, Inc. doing business as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cross v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03407
Plaintiff:
Richard Cross
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cross v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03416
Plaintiff:
Sandra Cross
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Allen et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Zackerie Allen, Nicholas Amatuzzo, Edwin Among and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cross v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America
as 0:2023cv02613
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cross
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Devens et al v. Southern Cross Insurance Solutions LLC
as 0:2023cv01767
Plaintiff:
Kristine Devens, Ignite Midwifery & Wellness LLC f/k/a Long Prairie Midwives, LLC, Ignite Midwifery & Wellness LLC and others
Defendant:
Southern Cross Insurance Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
First Guaranty Bank v. Larmore et al
as 0:2023mc00060
Plaintiff:
First Guaranty Bank
Defendant:
Jonathan M. Larmore, Arciterra Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC, Arciterra Strategic Retail-Wheatland IL, LLC and others
Receiver:
Trigild, Inc
Howard v. Cross et al
as 0:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard
Defendant:
Nicolas Cross, Bryan J. Schowalter and Benjamin Colburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
