Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Boggess et al v. Waterloo et al
as 6:2023cv02057
Plaintiff:
Lisa Boggess, Kim Buttshaw and Drake L. Boggess
Defendant:
City of Waterloo and Kenneth Schaaf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
RSV Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Society Insurance
as 4:2020cv00256
Defendant:
Society Insurance
Plaintiff:
RSV Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Drake Diner, MJPD Ventures, LLC doing business as Winestyles of Ankeny, MJPD Ventures, LLC On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated doing business as Winestyles of Ankeny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Drake v. Aquawood, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Liu Yi Man, Chan Ming Yiu, Chan Siu Lun and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Lynn Drake
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Rossely v. Drake University
as 4:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Tom Rossely
Defendant:
Drake University and Drake University Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doe v. Drake University et al
as 4:2016cv00623
Defendant:
Drake University, Drake University Board of Trustees, Earl Martin and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Richards v. Drake University et al
as 4:2014cv00514
Plaintiff:
Charles Richards
Defendant:
Drake University and Unnamed Individuals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
