Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Drake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02269
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Drake
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knox et al v. Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01593
Plaintiff:
Tandy J Knox, Megan Drake, Macie R Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Tee Jaye's Country Place, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Drake v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Drake
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Drake v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03631
Plaintiff:
Samantha Drake
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Drake v. Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drake
Defendant:
Adult Parole Authority, Warden A. C. Smith and Parole Officer Danielle Lesko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. City of Nelsonville et al
as 2:2022cv02701
Plaintiff:
Dan Lee Simms, Sr
Defendant:
City of Nelsonville, becky Barber, Harry Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
