Civil Rights Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01073
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00297
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2012cv05375
Plaintiff: KENNETH L. WILSON
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER and ADAM DOMMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hornberger v. Wilson et al
as 4:2012cv00412
Plaintiff: Cheryll Hornberger
Defendant: Richard L. Wilson , Kulpmont Borough , Kulpmont Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. BEIDELMAN
as 5:2011cv07472
Plaintiff: LEROY L. WILSON
Defendant: MICHAEL BEIDELMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILSON v. ACCOUNTS RECOVERY BUREAU
as 5:2011cv02282
Plaintiff: SHARRELL L. WILSON
Defendant: ACCOUNTS RECOVERY BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON et al v. GROVES et al
as 3:2010cv00166
Plaintiff: MASON L. WILSON and TAMESH WILSON
Defendant: BARRY P. GROVES, THERESA F. GROVES and SYLVAN-WHITTLE REAL ESTATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01492
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WILSON v. THE HONORABLE JOHN P. MURTHA et al
as 3:2008cv00067
Plaintiff: MASON L. WILSON
Defendant: THE HONORABLE JOHN P. MURTHA, JAMES P. TERRY, MARIBETH CULLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?