Cases 1 - 10 of 60
LLOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
TAUHEED LLOYD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RICHARDSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
LLOYD RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SUPT. PATRICIA THOMPSON, CAPT. ANDREW SKINNER and CHAPLAIN ABNER GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township et al
as 1:2023cv00808
Petitioner:
Lloyd G. Mays
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Coal Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lloyd v. Salamon et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Justin Lloyd
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. BOYLSTEIN
as 3:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
VICTOR LLOYD MITCHELL
Defendant:
DON BOYLSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DELOATCH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
SEAN DELOATCH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLOOM v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LLOYD BLOOM
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv01853
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LLOYD
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and GRIEVANCE COORDINATO MELINDA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STANTON v. USA
as 2:2020cv00907
Plaintiff:
KEENA J. STANTON, TRAVIS JACKSON, KEENAN STANTON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv01997
Plaintiff:
LLOYD HAROLD JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
