Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Salisbury v. Alexander et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Salisbury
Defendant:
Roderick Dante Alexander and Benin Logistics Group LLC
Other:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Mays v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township et al
as 1:2023cv00808
Petitioner:
Lloyd G. Mays
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Coal Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fallin v. Lloyd et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Glen M. Fallin
Defendant:
Michael Lloyd and CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Lloyd v. Keystone Forging Company
as 4:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lloyd
Defendant:
Keystone Forging Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Salamon et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
Justin Lloyd
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sewell v. Hanover Borough Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Sewell
Defendant:
Hanover Borough Police Department and Zachariah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
