Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
MADDOX v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2013cv00220
Plaintiff: CAMILLA MADDOX
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
TAYLOR v. FULWOOD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01911
Plaintiff: MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR
Defendant: ISAAC FULWOOD, L. JENKINS, PAUL HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADDOX v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff: BETTY MADDOX
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MADDOX v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02197
Plaintiff: NANCY MADDOX
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MADDOX v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01137
Plaintiff: MICHAEL A. MADDOX
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, SAMUEL MODIN and MICHAEL FANONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-7009
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
BOWIE v. MADDOX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv00948
Plaintiff: DAVID M. BOWIE
Defendant: CHARLES C. MADDOX , AUSTIN A. ANDERSEN , JEROME A. CAMPANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA v. Edward Maddox
as 08-3094
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant - Appellant: Edward A Maddox
MADDOX v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv00931
Petitioner: CHESTER J. MADDOX
Respondent: U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5157
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?