Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wilski v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Margaret K. Wilski
Defendant:
Jans and Joes Doe, Clatsop Cty Jail, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darmody v. Clatsop County et al
as 3:2021cv01261
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, John Doe #1, Clatsop County and others
Plaintiff:
William S. Darmody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter-Munroe et al v. McGraw
as 3:2019cv02009
Defendant:
Thuychi McGraw
Plaintiff:
Keyon Pitt, Emily Carpenter-Munroe and Jehla Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pitts v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv01851
Plaintiff:
Carolyn R. Pitts
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Pitts v. J. Gilmour Farm LLC
as 6:2018cv01679
Plaintiff:
Garry Pitts
Defendant:
J. Gilmour Farm LLC and Gilmour Pacific Trading LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bickers et al v. Casa Diablo, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Matilda Bickers Bickers and Amy Pitts
Defendant:
Casa Diablo, LLC, Devil Dancer, LLC, John and Jane Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Pitt v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv01929
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Douglas Leroy Pitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
