Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Keya Morgan v. County of Los Angeles District Attorneys Office et al
as 2:2023cv10474
Plaintiff:
Keya Morgan
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles District Attorneys Office, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Jeffrey C. Stodel, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lili Chin v. Seven Islands, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv07870
Plaintiff:
Lili Chin
Defendant:
Seven Islands, Inc. and E.E. Schenck Company
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Kim et al v. City of Belmont et al
as 3:2017cv02563
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hyobin Kim, June Kim, Paul Kim and others
Defendant:
City of Belmont, San Mateo County, Peninsula Humane Society and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Schenck v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv02348
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Ryker William Schenck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Aleene M. Queen et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01924
Plaintiff:
Pamela Brakhage, William Brakhage, Margie Jackson and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
