Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SCHENCK-FAISON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2023cv22437
Plaintiff:
J'QUAN SCHENCK-FAISON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICER T.M. BROWN, SGT. ABRAHAM JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
UNLIMITED PINS LLC v. SCHENCK, PRICE, SMITH & KING, LLP et al
as 2:2023cv03338
Plaintiff:
UNLIMITED PINS LLC
Defendant:
SCHENCK, PRICE, SMITH & KING, LLP and MICHAEL J. MAROTTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
CARPENTER v. SCHENCK
as 3:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
HUNTER BRYCE SCHENCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RUBIN v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUBIN
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, JAMES J DOLAN and others
v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L. BONVENUTO, JAMES J. DOLAN and others
WOLFSON v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
BARBARA WOLFSON
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L. BONVENUTO, JAMES J. DOLAN and others
BUSHANSKY v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, JAMES J DOLAN and others
SCHENCK v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCHENCK
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SCHENCK et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv09211
Plaintiff:
VICKIE SCHENCK and HERBERT SCHENCK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
