Cases 1 - 10 of 477
Smith v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04085
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Cody Waterkotte, Jason Chenoweth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv02401
Plaintiff:
Travis Cook
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cook County and Cook County Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01574
Plaintiff:
Daron Donell Travis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Maxwell v. Shifrin et al
as 4:2024cv04032
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maxwell
Defendant:
Craig Shifrin, Richard Travis, Amy Louck Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Nodine et al
as 1:2023cv16725
Plaintiff:
DeLaurence Robinson
Defendant:
Lt. S Nodine, Lt. Sykes, Lt. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braden v. Benton et al
as 3:2023cv03588
Plaintiff:
Travis Wade Braden
Defendant:
City of Benton, David Bartoni, Anthony Skobel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
