Cases 1 - 10 of 1,576
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Scalf et al
as 7:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
William Matthias Mills
Defendant:
Officer S. Scalf, Officer Geldenhuys, Officer B. Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Merlin Williams
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demond Williams
Defendant:
Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Thompson
Defendant:
Johnson, William Diehl, Kevin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Williams, Moore, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rick White, Major King, Nurse Practitioner Jesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Bailey, Williams and Brockington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Gilbert, Collins, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Collins, Williams, Neece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
