Cases 11 - 20 of 4,583
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams et al v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antoine-Denard Williams, Sr. and Virginia Loretta Baker
Defendant:
State of Florida, Joseph Biden, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Windsor v. Pepperman et al
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William Michael Windsor
Defendant:
Judge Carla R. Pepperman, Emily Curington and Gary Cooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudson v. HomeGood's Corp et al
as 0:2024cv60739
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Hudson
Defendant:
HomeGood's Corp and Raheem Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Jung
as 8:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Quinton McCoy
Defendant:
William Frederic Jung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Boulder Care
as 5:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Dana D Williams
Defendant:
Boulder Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bigge v. C. W. Roberts Contracting, Incorporated
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
William Bigge
Defendant:
C. W. Roberts Contracting, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
