Cases 11 - 20 of 4,346
Brown v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
William H. Brown
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Amirah Williams
Defendant:
State of Connecticut and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
William Holmes
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buster v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Douglas William Buster
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Joe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
William Young
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Martin, Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
David George Williams
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. State of New York DOCCS Board of Parole Counselor's Office
as 9:2024cv00399
Petitioner:
William Michael Hall
Respondent:
State of New York DOCCS Board of Parole Counselor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02359
Plaintiff:
Jahreek Bush
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York, County of Sullivan, New York State Police Liberty Barracks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bundscho v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv06160
Plaintiff:
Nathan R. Bundscho
Defendant:
Chief Green and William Whalden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Kareem Green and Satarah Green
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Shaniqua Harden, Mary Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
