Cases 11 - 20 of 1,697
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cole Hancock
Defendant:
Erin Williams, Marla Doughman and J Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEAVER v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WEAVER
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DOAN and QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. STAFF et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. STAFF and LECLARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWENS v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
WILLIAM OWENS
Respondent:
PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
