Cases 41 - 50 of 3,952
LeRoy v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
William LeRoy
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Christian v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
William David Christian, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Daniels v. USA
as 5:2024cv00152
Petitioner:
William Isaac Daniels
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Leonard Automatics, Inc. v. Houser
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Leonard Automatics, Inc.
Defendant:
William C. Houser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Donail Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bardge v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
William Alvin Bardge
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2024ct03053
Plaintiff:
Harold Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Major Price, Batman Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
