Cases 41 - 50 of 1,290
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Beckwith v. Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Todd Jackson, Jason Steen, John Gutbezahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Galm v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
Paul Galm
Defendant:
State of Oregon, John Malone, Shannon Moshofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gibson
as 3:2023cv00863
Petitioner:
Eric William Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Rachel Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Myers et al
as 3:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
Clint Williams
Defendant:
Jeff Myers, Drake Durham, Thomas Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. OSH Mail Room et al
as 6:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Immanuel Menelik Williams
Defendant:
OSH Mail Room, Adriana O., Beverly H. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
William Liles
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Crapser et al v. NaphCare, Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald Crapser and Rhonda Burke
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc, Clackamas County, Jill Crum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
