Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Piccadilly Holdings, II LLC et al v. Marshall et al
as 0:2023cv60977
Plaintiff:
Piccadilly Holdings, II LLC and William Bennett
Defendant:
Alex Marshall, NO-H20 USA. INC and Emmet O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Piccadilly Holdings II, LLC et al v. NO-H2O USA, INC. et al
as 0:2023cv60978
Plaintiff:
Piccadilly Holidngs II, LLC, William Bennett, Alex Marshall and others
Defendant:
NO-H2O USA, INC. and Emmet O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
BENNETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17845
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BENNETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demps v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Jamal Demps
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Mr. Hodgeson, Clara Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. DRAKE et al
as 3:2015cv01350
Plaintiff:
MORRIS LEE MOORE, JR
Defendant:
Greg Drake, William Bennett, J STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. DRAKE et al
as 1:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
MORRIS LEE MOORE, JR
Defendant:
GREG DRAKE, WILLIAM BENNETT, J STEPHENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Reddish et al
as 3:2015cv00719
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Daniels
Defendant:
Barry Reddish, Mark Taylor, Herbert McCloud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Reddish et al
as 3:2014cv00790
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Edwards
Defendant:
B.V. Reddish, Brad Whitehead, William Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Linkamerica Express, Inc.
as 8:2012cv00962
Plaintiff:
William Bennett
Defendant:
Linkamerica Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
