Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Crayton, Jr. v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01017
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Ed Walker, f/n/u Baumgardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2017cv01016
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Tony Parker, Eric Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. West Tennessee State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2013cv02115
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
West Tennessee State Penitentiary, Jerry Lester, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Lester et al
as 2:2012cv03051
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton, Jr.
Defendant:
Lester, Haley, Pickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. West Tenn State Penn et al
as 2:2012cv02799
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
West Tenn State Penn, T.D.O.C., Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. C.C.A. Whiteville Facility et al
as 1:2010cv01209
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
C.C.A. Whiteville Facility, Harris, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. CJC County Jail et al
as 2:2009cv02699
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
CJC County Jail, Sheriff's Office, Sgt Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2009cv02499
Plaintiff:
William Charles Crayton
Defendant:
City of Memphis and Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crayton v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2009cv02343
Petitioner:
William Charles Crayton
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
