Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
William D Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips 66 Carrier LLC v. 4.2 Acres, Osage County, Oklahoma, more or less et al
as 4:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Carrier LLC
Defendant:
4.2 Acres, Osage County, Oklahoma, more or less, United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Roni R Brumley and others
Burke v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Michele D Burke
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The, G T Bynum, Mark Swinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruggles v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
William D Ruggles, II
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dye v. St. John Health System, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00707
Plaintiff:
DeEtta Dye
Defendant:
William D Smith and Jane Phillips Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carpenter v. Aberdeen Collection Enterprises et al
as 5:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
William D Carpenter
Defendant:
Aberdeen Collection Enterprises, Tulsa County District Court Judges, Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Luke v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv00608
Plaintiff:
William D Luke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America v. Richardson
as 5:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William D Richardson
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Doak v. Thornell et al
as 5:2012cv00708
Defendant:
William D Thornell, Don Thornell CPA Inc, Dianne Naler and others
Plaintiff:
John Doak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
