Cases 1 - 10 of 11
William Stringer v. LaDonna Wilcox, et al
as 23-3284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William L. Stringer
Defendant / Appellee:
LaDonna Wilcox, Sergeant of Property, Adam Benda, Property Captain, Chris Tripp, Warden, Iowa State Penitentiary and others
Stringer v. Wilcox et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
William L. Stringer
Defendant:
LaDonna Wilcox, Adam Benda, Chris Tripp and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stringer v. Iowa State Penitentiary
as 4:2021cv00301
Plaintiff:
William L Stringer and William L. Stringer
Defendant:
Iowa State Penitentiary
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russo et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2014cv80049
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Petitioner:
Dino Russo , Vonsheila Hatcher , Deni Michelle Ackeridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company v. Ace Grading Company, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ace Grading Company, LLC, Jackson County, Georgia , The Jackson County Airport Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Old Republic Insurance Company v. Jackson County, Georgia et al
as 2:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Old Republic Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jackson County, Georgia, The Jackson County Airport Authority, John T. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
William Stringer v. John Fayram
as 10-1621
Petitioner - Appellant:
William L. Stringer
Respondent - Appellee:
John Fayram, Warden, Anamosa State Penitentiary
William Lavon Stringer v. Crane Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84283
Plaintiff:
William Lavon Stringer
Defendant:
Crane Co
STRINGER v. CRANE COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv84283
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAVON STRINGER
Defendant:
CRANE COMPANY, FMC CORP., ITT INDUSTRIAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
