Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Roger Lloyd v. William Foy
as 20-2227
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM FOY, Acting Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROGER LLOYD
McHalpine v. Foy
as 2:2020cv13123
Plaintiff:
Derek Scott McHalpine
Defendant:
William Foy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McHalpine #781764 v. Foy
as 1:2020cv01099
Petitioner:
Derek Scott McHalpine #781764
Respondent:
William Foy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jamel Robinson v. Hanna Saad, et al
as 20-1873
Defendant / Appellee:
PAIGE E. HILLIER, RN, JILL LAWRENCE, Psychologist, ALEKSANDRA WILANOWSKI, Psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL LEON ROBINSON
Cruse #458762 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00436
Defendant:
Unknown Tanner, B. Evers, Unknown Szostak and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Cruse #458762
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Lyles v. Darnell Jackson, et al
as 20-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
M. WALTERS, Quarter-Master supervisor, ROBERT KACZMAREK, Saginaw County Prosecutor, KATHLEEN DAVISON HUNTER, Assistant Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER L. LYLES
Michael Salami v. Thomas Winn, et al
as 19-1700
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM FOY, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager of Grievance Section-MDOC and THOMAS WINN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Michael Salami v. Thomas Winn, et al
as 19-1634
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM FOY, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager of Grievance Section-MDOC and THOMAS WINN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI
Scott Dohn v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 19-1284
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS WINN, Warden, Saginaw Correctional Facility, TIA CLARK, Special Activities Director, Saginaw Correctional Facility, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT DOHN
Dohn v. Washington et al
as 2:2018cv10884
Plaintiff:
Scott Dohn
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Thomas Winn O'Bell, William Foy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
