Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Evans et al v. GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
William G. Evans and Barbara Evans
Defendant:
GEICO Advantage Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Fragua v. Fragua et al
as 1:2023cv00760
Plaintiff:
Rose Fragua and William G. Fragua
Defendant:
William Julian Fragua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Watson v. Watson et al
as 6:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Watson, I
Defendant:
William G. Watson, Jamesine P. Watson, Sheryl A. Ebert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Skinner v. Prummell et al
as 1:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Robert Skinner
Defendant:
William G. Prummell, Jr., Lorenzo Mata, Charlotte County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cupps, et al v. Pioneer Canal-Lake Hattie Irrigation District
as 21-8088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. MARK CUPPS, MARK B. KOENIG, CHERYL L. KOENIG and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PIONEER CANAL-LAKE HATTIE IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Gardner et al v. Engenious Designs LLC
as 2:2021cv02548
Plaintiff:
William G. Gardner, III and Way Too Cool LLC
Defendant:
Engenious Designs LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Broach v. Yegappan, et al
as 21-1390
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM G. BROACH
Defendant / Appellee:
MUTHULAKSHMI YEGAPPAN, ROBERT MAGNUSSON, ANGELA MORRIS and others
Gardner et al v. Engenious Designs LLC
as 2:2021cv02364
Plaintiff:
William G. Gardner, Way Too Cool LLC and William G. Gardner, III
Defendant:
Engenious Designs LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kaufman v. USA
as 1:2020cv03060
Plaintiff:
William G. Kaufman
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Fucci et al v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Samson, Maxon-Multiline, EC9 Holdings and others
Defendant:
J&J Cubit Construction, Christopher J. Ashby, Kate Jensen and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
