Cases 1 - 10 of 297
William Creasy v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5178
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. CREASY
Respondent:
VINCENT VANTELL, Warden
William Creasy v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5171
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. CREASY
Respondent:
VINCENT VANTELL, Warden
William Creasy v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5172
Petitioner:
WILLIAM G. CREASY
Respondent:
VINCENT VANTELL, Warden, Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex
Holder v. Prummell et al
as 2:2023cv00847
Plaintiff:
Jeramy Michael Holder
Defendant:
William G. Prummell, Charlotte County Jail and Charlotte County Municipality
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Prummell
as 2:2023cv00784
Petitioner:
Jeramy Michael Holder
Respondent:
William G. Prummell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paterno v. Arthur M. Cromarty Complex et al
as 2:2023cv04592
Plaintiff:
Michael-John: Paterno
Defendant:
J. Arthur M. Cromarty Complex, Hon Judge Karen M. Wilutis, Riccardo J. Mascio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rossbach v. Lake County Montana
as 9:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
William G. Rossbach
Respondent:
Lake County Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Graves v. Maricopa County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 22-17026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT TERRELLE GRAVES
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ALLISTER ADEL, District Attorney, WALMART SUPERCENTER and others
Skinner v. Prummell et al
as 1:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Robert Skinner
Defendant:
William G. Prummell, Jr., Lorenzo Mata, Charlotte County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reagan v. City of Barberton et al
as 5:2022cv01470
Plaintiff:
William G. Reagan
Defendant:
City of Barberton, Barberton Police Department, Edward Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
