Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 23-15466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hayes v. Gitter
as 2:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Daveon Kyree Hayes
Respondent:
William Gitter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitfield v. Keast et al
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitfield
Defendant:
J. Keast, Jessica Rambur, Fernandeis Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 23-15280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, terminated per #9 FAC, ELY STATE PRISON, terminated per #9 FAC, EXUM, Dr. terminated per #9 FAC and others
Ammar Harris v. F. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
F. DREESEN, MORIN, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McGuire v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Robert McGuire
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Warden William Gittere and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Bollinger v. William Gittere
as 23-99002
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BOLLINGER
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden
Barry Harris v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-15402
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRY HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden #9 FAC, B. WILLIAMS, #9 FAC and STATE OF NEVADA, #9 FAC
Sampson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Willie Sampson
Defendant:
William Gittere, Lt C. Sawin, Lt Michael Flamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Lorenzo et al
as 3:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Lorenzo, Wilson Bernales, Melina Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
