Cases 81 - 90 of 236
Lofton v. Ely State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Donte Lofton
Defendant:
Ely State Prison, Warden William Gittere, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 22-15548
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Kevin Kennedy v. Shelly Williams, et al
as 22-15465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN KENNEDY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLY WILLIAMS, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Pete Kefalas v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15533
Petitioner / Appellant:
PETE KEFALAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jefferson v. Gittere et al
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jefferson
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, William Revbart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Devon Cooper v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15708
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVON COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Charles Daniels, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gittere
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Arnold Anderson
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keck v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
William Keck
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
