Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe) v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade & Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, The General Insurance Company, SunTrust Banks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Employee Benefits
Wade et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade and Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank and BB&T Merger, Suntrust "Truist" Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Smith v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc./SunTrust Bank/Truist Bank et al
as 8:2020cv02559
Plaintiff:
Robinette Gravely Smith
Defendant:
William H. Rogers, Jr. and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc./SunTrust Bank/Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Anna R. Cablik, Suntrust Corp., Steven C. Voorhees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Rossi Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc./SunTrust Bank et al
as 8:2019cv03274
Plaintiff:
Robinette Gravely Smith
Defendant:
William H. Rogers, Jr. and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc./SunTrust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LR Trust v. William Rogers, Jr., et al
as 17-14635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LR TRUST
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. ROGERS, JR., PAUL R. GARCIA, M. DOUGLAS IVESTER and others
:
SUNTRUST BANKS, INC.
LR Trust v. Rogers et al
as 1:2016cv04132
Plaintiff:
LR Trust
Defendant:
William H. Rogers, Jr., Paul R. Garcia, Douglas M. Ivester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mannato v. Wells et al
as 1:2011cv04402
Plaintiff:
Edward Mannato
Defendant:
James M. Wells, III , Thomas E. Freeman , Mark A. Chancy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
