Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HUNTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07370
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Miguel Molina v. William Hunter, et al
as 13-2624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM HUNTER, RAFAEL CORDERO and JACK CUMMINGS
MOLINA v. HUNTER et al
as 2:2013cv02497
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL MOLINA
Defendant:
WILLIAM HUNTER, RAFAEL CORDERO and JACK CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER et al v. GAF CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv79976
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM HUNTER and FRANCES P. HUNTER
Defendant:
GAF CORP., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MILLER et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv70133
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUNTER MILLER and JUDY G. MILLER
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cross Claimant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY
Cross Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HUNTER et al v. STERLING BANK et al
as 2:2008cv00879
Plaintiff:
HELEN HUNTER and WILLIAM HUNTER
Defendant:
STERLING BANK, W.G. OSBORNE CONSTRUCTION, LLC, WILLIAM G. OSBORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JOHNSON v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA. et al
as 2:2007cv02966
Defendant:
JOHN RECHNER, CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA., JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
RASSAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
