Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Vernon King, Jr. v. Rich Steven, et al
as 13-40637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VERNON KING, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RICH N. STEVEN, WILLIAM J. PITTMAN and BRAD LIVINGSTON
Smith v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division et al
as 1:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ideria Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Richard K Alford, Gene A Kroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stroud v. Chaison et al
as 1:2012cv00266
Plaintiff:
Mark D Stroud
Defendant:
Dianna C Chaison, William J Pittman and Gene Kroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crumbley v. Livingston et al
as 1:2012cv00191
Petitioner:
James Crumbley
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, William J Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woods v. Pittman et al
as 1:2012cv00126
Plaintiff:
Sammy Woods
Defendant:
William J. Pittman, Central Grievance Office and Counel for Offender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Pittman et al
as 4:2012cv00562
Plaintiff:
Sammy Woods
Defendant:
William J. Pittman, Central Grievance Office and Counel for Offender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Steven et al
as 1:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
Vernon King, Jr
Defendant:
Rich N Steven, William J Pittman and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Steven et al
as 1:2010cv00187
Petitioner:
Vernon King, Jr
Respondent:
Rich N Steven, William J Pittman and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Rich et al
as 1:2010cv00188
Petitioner:
Vernon King, Jr
Respondent:
Steven N Rich, William J Pittman and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Summers v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2009cv00314
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Steven N Rich, Kent Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
