Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GEORGE PIRRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Preston et al
as 4:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Vernon Preston, Correct Care Solutions, Richard Ellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv02624
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. USA
as 2:2016cv01196
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02134
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. WARDEN, FCI HAZELTON
as 3:2015cv00258
Petitioner:
BERT WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI HAZELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. USA
as 3:2013cv00111
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
BERT WILLIAM JOHNSON, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JOHNSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2012cv05156
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BARNES v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
BRIAN E. COLEMAN, GARTH WALLS, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TYRONE-ANTHONY et al v. KNAUER et al
as 2:2009cv02796
Plaintiff:
TYRONE-ANTHONY, SANDRA HASSETE and WANDA DENISE HUNT
Defendant:
JULIE KNAUER, ARIAS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
