Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harris v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00972
Defendant:
C. Anderson, Ana Dowdy, S. Eason and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godwin et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Amy Godwin, William Martin, Tanya Mathews and others
Defendant:
Corteva, Inc., DuPont de Nemours, Inc., EIDP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DeCory v. Anderson et al
as 5:2022ct03152
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory and William Martin Ardene DeCory
Defendant:
D. Anderson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DECORY v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARTIN ARDENE DECORY
Defendant:
D. ANDERSON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00564
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
William Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
MARTIN v. USA
as 1:2014cv00906
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JAMES WILLIAM MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC. v. FAMILY FIRST LIFE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00382
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Defendant:
FAMILY FIRST LIFE, LLC , SHAWN L. MEAIKE , JERROD EWING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC. v. EWING et al
as 1:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Defendant:
JERROD EWING , MYLES JERDAN , DOMINIQUE RODGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Johns
as 5:2010hc02085
Petitioner:
Jess William Martin
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00312
Plaintiff:
Rodney William Martin
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
