Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SHINER v. SAUL
as 5:2021cv01463
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS SHINER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MORRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55098
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MORRIS v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2010cv05887
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMES et al v. PATHMARK STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05388
Plaintiff:
MARLENE HOLMES and WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
PATHMARK STORES, INC. and THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
AARSETH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33305
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS, JR. and WILLIAM MORRIS, JR.
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MORRIS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66324
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A C & S, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MORRIS v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86174
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MORRIS v. ASTRUE
as 2:2007cv03400
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
