Cases 41 - 50 of 63
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02559
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Not Classified By Court:
DUSTIN LEE HONKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Anthony D. Williams v. William P. Barr et al
as 2:2019cv07304
Defendant:
H. J. Hurwitz, J. Monarez, F. Ponce and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Allman v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv02300
Defendant:
Petter C. McKittrick, S. Amanda Marshall, Arnot Stephen and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick L. Allman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Constant et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Petitioner:
Gary Freemont, Thomas Marvens, Pierre Rameck and others
Respondent:
Honorable Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, United States Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey J. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEMAN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02187
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DENT v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant:
J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABDULKADER v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02199
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
MUNIR ABDULKADER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HARVEY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02196
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
ADRION HARVEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CERRUTI v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02107
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. BORDLEY, SUSAN B. GERSON, DONALD TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CERRUTI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HESS v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02046
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. HESS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY and WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
