Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 218
Jose Morales-Ruiz v. William Barr
as 20-2313
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS MORALES-RUIZ
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Damian Job Vaz v. William P. Barr
as 20-2299
Petitioner: DAMIAN JOB VAZ
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Andre Newton Mae v. William Barr
as 20-2300
Petitioner: ANDRE NEWTON MAE
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Wesley Ira Purkey v. Warden, USP Terre Haute, et al
as 20-2280
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, USP TERRE HAUTE, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant: WESLEY I. PURKEY
Bukola Omowole v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2285
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner: BUKOLA LOMI OMOWOLE
Dale Hartkemeyer, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2262
Defendant / Appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Plaintiff / Appellant: DALE HARTKEMEYER, also known as Seigen and MARK O'KEEFE, Father
Omar Galan-Reyes v. Damon Acuff, et al
as 20-2263
Petitioner: OMAR GALAN-REYES
Respondent: DAMON ACUFF, CHAD F. WOLF, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and others
Daniel Lewis Lee v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-2256
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Defendant / Appellee: T. J. WATSON, Warden, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Salomon Rodriguez-Varela v. William Barr
as 20-2279
Petitioner: SALOMON RODRIGUEZ-VARELA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States
LEE V. BARR, et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Plaintiff: DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Defendant: T.J. WATSON, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?