Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 70
TREADWELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff: DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMALSON
Defendant: LT DAVIS, LIEUTENANT RONNIE SHOEMAKER, MCCRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02274
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GIUDICE v. BALL et al
as 5:2019cv00153
Defendant: BRANDEN GODFREE, CORDERO WILIS, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Plaintiff: NELSON DEL GIUDICE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYWARD v. TOBY et al
as 5:2018cv00357
Defendant: ANNETTE TOBY, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CANNON, REGIONAL DIRECTOR ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff: BENNY HAYWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAJOR v. TARRELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00356
Defendant: SUPERINTENDANT MICHAEL CANNON, OFFICER SHAKEURA DANIELS, RICKY MYRICK and others
Plaintiff: TROY S MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. POWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00334
Defendant: KAREN FORBS, DEPUTY WARDEN WILLIAM POWELL, JOHANNES GOODY and others
Plaintiff: EUGENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. CANNON et al
as 5:2018cv00223
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY JAMEL DENNIS
Defendant: MICHAEL CANNON, WILLIAM POWELL, GEORGE BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOOKADOO v. DAVIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00224
Plaintiff: PHILLIP A LOOKADOO
Defendant: BELINDA DAVIS, ERIC SELLERS, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUCHANNON v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00192
Plaintiff: CHAD BUCHANNON
Defendant: ERIC SELLERS, MICHAEL CANNON, WILLIAM POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00185
Plaintiff: DANTHONY HICKS
Defendant: ERIC SELLERS, WILLIAM POWELL, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?