Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Horton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
JULIA, Individually and as Special Administrator o HORTON and Julia Horton
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC., as Successor-in-Interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY, AR WILFLEY AND SONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Marcia Vanover v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
MARCIA VANOVER, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of DAVID VANOVER, Deceased and Marica Vanover
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor-by-Merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., A.O. Smith Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. and Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross Defendant:
Kohler, Co., Sid Harvey Industries Inc. and York International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Reinbold v. Advance Auto Parts Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00605
Plaintiff:
Janice Reinbold
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Blackmer Pump Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Blackmer Pump Company , Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Farr v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01305
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Farr
Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., William Powell Company, The and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ellis v. Afton Pumps, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00140
Defendant:
Afton Pumps, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, Ameron International Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ellis
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Ingersoll-Rand Company , The Gorman-Rupp Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Crane Co. , A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant:
Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant:
Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant:
Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Knasinski et al v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jerome Knasinski and Janet Knasinski
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cross_claimant:
Brand Insulations, Inc. , ITT Corporation , Trane US, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Aldrich Pump Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watts v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Steven Watts
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Carver Pump Company , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Steven Watts , Carver Pump Company , 84 Lumber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Webb v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00218
Defendant:
Avocet Enterprises, Inc., CBS Corporation, Flowserve Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
