Cases 11 - 20 of 151
Vasquez
as 7:2016cv00115
Petitioner:
Pablo Lucio Vasquez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Lave, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-70006
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH ROLAND LAVE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Battaglia v. Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID
as 3:2016cv00687
Petitioner:
John David Battaglia
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walter Sorto v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-70005
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER ALEXANDER SORTO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gilmar Guevara v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-70004
Petitioner - Appellant:
GILMAR ALEXANDER GUEVARA
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Quintin Jones v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-70003
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUINTIN PHILLIPPE JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Soliz v. Stephens
as 3:2014cv04556
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Soliz
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Wilkins v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-70002
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CHUBASCO WILKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Juan Segundo v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-70001
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN RAMON MEZA SEGUNDO
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Rockwell v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01055
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kwame A Rockwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.