Cases 61 - 70 of 494
Eason v. Stephens et al
as 5:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Russell Wade Eason
Defendant:
William Stephens, FNU Wilson, FNU Facio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Olive v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-11235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, KIETH GENTRY, JOE MILBERN and others
Leroy DeBose v. TDCJ Parole Division, et al
as 16-20513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY DEBOSE
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION, WILLIAM STEPHENS, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutions Division, Executive Director, STEWART JENKINS, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Division Director and others
Hall v. Daigle et al
as 4:2016cv02227
Plaintiff:
Floyd William Hall
Defendant:
C S Daigle, Brian S Smith, Kelly Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decker v. Stephens et al
as 4:2016cv02175
Plaintiff:
Kurby G Decker
Defendant:
William Stephens , Blake H Norman , Randall L Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blank v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
David Vern Blank
Defendant:
William Stephens, Pedro Gonzalez, Monte Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Livingston et al
as 3:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
Lamont E Wilson
Defendant:
Brad Livingston and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debose v. TDCJ Parole Division et al
as 4:2016cv02120
Petitioner:
Leroy Debose
Defendant:
TDCJ Parole Division, William Stephens, Stewart Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarkozy v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv02028
Plaintiff:
Romero Sarkozy
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
